<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PostgreSQL: UPDATE a table using ORDER BY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pelagodesign.com/blog/2007/07/23/postgresql-update-a-table-using-order-by/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pelagodesign.com/blog/2007/07/23/postgresql-update-a-table-using-order-by/</link>
	<description>Santa Barbara Web Design and Web Development Blog on the web world and other randoms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:31:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jasper</title>
		<link>http://www.pelagodesign.com/blog/2007/07/23/postgresql-update-a-table-using-order-by/comment-page-1/#comment-6504</link>
		<dc:creator>jasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pelagodesign.com/blog/2007/07/23/postgresql-update-a-table-using-order-by/#comment-6504</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I tried this solution over and over again, i just cant get it to work. If I do a SELECT query on my newly created view, it shows all the data ordered like it supposed to be. But when executing an update against the view (with the rule in place) it just seems to ignore the order in the view. So i end up with exactly the same result as i would have executing an update query against the normal table?
I am using postgres 8.4.2, not sure if that changes anything.

Any help would be appreciated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I tried this solution over and over again, i just cant get it to work. If I do a SELECT query on my newly created view, it shows all the data ordered like it supposed to be. But when executing an update against the view (with the rule in place) it just seems to ignore the order in the view. So i end up with exactly the same result as i would have executing an update query against the normal table?<br />
I am using postgres 8.4.2, not sure if that changes anything.</p>
<p>Any help would be appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.pelagodesign.com/blog/2007/07/23/postgresql-update-a-table-using-order-by/comment-page-1/#comment-6213</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pelagodesign.com/blog/2007/07/23/postgresql-update-a-table-using-order-by/#comment-6213</guid>
		<description>You saved my day!
Thank you for this useful information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You saved my day!<br />
Thank you for this useful information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
